In-Play Betting in Australia: Why We Can't Have Nice Things
Every other major betting market in the world has online in-play. Australia doesn't, for a specific legal reason that dates back to 2001. Here's what actually exists and what you can do with it.
Tom Rafferty
Columnist
10 min read·Published 27 Apr 2026
If you've watched overseas punters casually place live bets on their phones mid-match while you sit there yelling at the TV, you've experienced the specific frustration of being an Australian sports bettor. Online in-play betting - the ability to place a bet on a sport while it's being played - is restricted in Australia in a way that has no clean equivalent in most other developed betting markets.
The reason is the Interactive Gambling Act 2001. The workarounds are genuinely annoying. The one proper escape valve exists and it's Betfair Exchange. This is the explainer.
What the IGA actually says
The Interactive Gambling Act 2001, and its 2017 amendments, prohibit Australian-licensed bookmakers from accepting online sports bets placed after a game has started. The exact wording is more nuanced than that but the practical upshot is that if an AFL game has kicked off, Sportsbet, Ladbrokes, Bet365 Australia and every other AU corporate bookmaker cannot legally accept a bet on that match through their website or app.
The intent of the legislation was to limit problem gambling by reducing the 24/7 accessibility of wagering. The effect has been to push in-play betting into a narrower set of channels that are often worse, not better, for the customers the legislation was supposed to protect.
In-play racing. Betting on horse, harness and greyhound racing during the race remains legal online. This is a historical exemption. Corporate bookmakers all offer fluent in-play racing markets.
In-play via phone. Australian customers can legally place in-play sports bets by telephone. Sportsbet, TAB and Ladbrokes all maintain phone-betting services for this purpose. The customer rings a call centre, gives their account details, and places the bet verbally. The entire experience is archaic, the margins on the prices are wider than pre-game online rates, and stake limits are often lower. Very few AU punters use phone betting regularly. It exists to technically comply with the allow-but-don't-make-easy intent of the regulation.
Pre-match betting up to kickoff. Online sports betting is fine before the game starts. The cutoff is the actual commencement of play.
What corporates do within the restrictions
AU corporate bookmakers have tried to work around in-play restrictions in a few ways over the years. Some worked. Some didn't.
Click-to-call buttons (2015-2017). Several corporates added buttons to their mobile apps that, when pressed, automatically initiated a phone call to the bookmaker's betting line. The customer could then verbally place the in-play bet. The click-to-call experience felt close to online in-play betting and was hugely popular for a brief period. The government closed this loophole in the 2017 IGA amendments by explicitly banning the automated phone-initiation workaround.
Cash-out features. Most AU corporates offer “Cash Out” on pre-match bets - the ability to close out a bet early for a guaranteed return smaller than the potential payout. This is technically not an in-play bet (you're ending an existing wager, not opening a new one), so it falls outside the restrictions. Cash-out is commercially valuable for bookmakers because the offered close-out price always contains vig, meaning the customer typically takes worse expected value than riding the bet out. The corporates love cash-out. It's one of their highest-margin features.
“Second chance” and specialty live markets. Some books offer markets that open during a match but refer to outcomes in a separately-running “period” - the next quarter, the next 10 minutes, the next goal. These operate under various legal interpretations of whether they're “in play” on the main match. The markets are typically small, with wide margins and low stake limits.
Why Betfair is different
Betfair Exchange operates under different regulatory treatment because it's an exchange rather than a bookmaker. Users aren't betting against Betfair - they're betting against each other, with Betfair operating the matching infrastructure. The IGA's in-play restrictions apply to bookmakers, and Betfair Exchange occupies a different regulatory category.
The practical result is that Betfair Exchange runs full in-play markets during actual AFL, NRL, EPL, NBA and other sports matches. Prices update in real time. Liquidity during live events is typically good on popular markets, acceptable on niche ones. Commission is the standard 6.5% on net winnings, which matters for in-play strategies where you might be trading positions quickly.
For any AU bettor who wants to actually bet live sports in any serious way, Betfair Exchange is the only option. It's not pleasant - the interface is worse than a corporate book, the commission adds friction, and the liquidity on smaller markets can be poor. But it exists, and it's legal, and it's the reason the Betfair defence piece argues that every serious AU bettor needs a Betfair account regardless of the other complaints.
What this means practically
A few implications of the in-play restrictions for how AU advantage bettors operate.
Pre-match line timing is everything. If you can't bet during the match, you have to place your bets before kickoff. That means catching line movements driven by team news or pre-game signals becomes disproportionately valuable. See the NRL line movement piece for how this plays out in practice.
Cash-out decisions are always suboptimal vs exchange. Taking Sportsbet's cash-out offer on a winning bet is almost always worse than holding the bet and hedging at the same price on Betfair Exchange. The cash-out price includes the bookmaker's vig. The exchange lay price is a market price. Over hundreds of decisions, the difference is meaningful.
Live arbitrage exists but it's hard. Because Betfair Exchange runs in-play but the corporate books don't, it's theoretically possible to find in-play arbs between a Betfair exchange price and a corporate pre-match bet that hasn't been closed. In practice, the corporate's suspension system kicks in at kickoff and very little usable pricing survives. Live arbitrage is more theoretical than practical for AU bettors.
The regulatory risk is ongoing. There have been periodic conversations at the federal level about further restricting online wagering in Australia, including potential additional limits on pre-match live-odds timing. If you're building any strategy that depends on specific aspects of current AU regulation, build with the assumption that the rules may tighten further.
The summary
Australia restricts online in-play sports betting because of the IGA. Corporate bookmakers cannot accept online live bets on sports after kickoff. The workarounds (phone betting, click-to-call replacements, cash-out) range from impractical to actively bad value. Betfair Exchange is the one meaningful live-betting venue.
The operational takeaway for AU advantage bettors is that you should organise your strategy around pre-match timing, develop relationships with any liquid Betfair Exchange markets relevant to your sports, and treat the regulatory environment as a fixed constraint rather than something likely to improve.
For the specific strategies AU bettors can actually use within these constraints, the guides cover arbitrage, +EV, CLV, bankroll management and gubbing-avoidance. For the structural reality of why corporate books limit sharp customers - which interacts with the IGA restrictions in complicated ways - the bookmaker-limiting piece has the full logic.
About the author
Tom Rafferty
Columnist
Tom has been punting in Australia long enough to have strong opinions about most of it. Writes the opinion column — multis, Betfair, why your mate is wrong about betting, and the cultural side of being a sharp AU punter.
Explainer9 min
Neds Promotions and Bonus Bet Turnover Rules, Explained
Neds runs one of the more aggressive promotional calendars among AU bookmakers. The turnover rules matter more than the headline offer amounts.
